The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. Answer (1 of 4): Hi! Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. What could this mean? The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Sometimes they are more busy. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. The finals started yesterday. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. Press J to jump to the feed. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. Rejection, organisation and freedom: What it's really like being a Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative, Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. 1124. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). [CDATA[> Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. So dont feel upset! Thank you for visiting nature.com. on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Editorial process : Springer Support Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. #AcademicChatter" Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. ISSN 1546-1726 (online) response letterresubmit, 3. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. Although optional, the cover letter is an excellent opportunity to briefly discuss the importance of the submitted work and why it is appropriate for the journal. When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. 9.3 weeks. We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Committee for Health, Social Services and Public Safety How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? What does this mean and should I contact the editor? It can impact your confidence and make you question your ability and skill. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. b. Production 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made To obtain [CDATA[// >
editor decision started nature rejection