Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. I would! Light falloff (vignetting) gets pretty high (0.73 EV wide open, but drops to 0.3 EV at f/2.8, and only 0.17 EV at f/4. Latter looks quite professional.. Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Review - Imaging Resource The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. enlarge. They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. However, they can be perfectly corrected with narrow band H-alpha or OIII filters. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. Hey! For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. Because it manage to do so. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. The Legendary Canon 60Da | Astrophotography DSLR (Image Examples) One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. Samyang 135mm f2, 100mm f2.8, and asperical 16mm f2.8. Required fields are marked *. I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? I mainly use for head shot photography. Test Notes The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. Definitely now on my to-buy list. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. The lens is available on eBay for around $200. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. My first shot was a section of the constellation Sagittarius that included the Lagoon Nebula, and Trifid Nebula. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. (purchased for $900). Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! I disagree. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. This looks to be an excellent lens with fantastic results. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). I used this lens quite a bit years ago as my main working lens. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. Fast. Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 Check them out for yourself! Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. Creamy smooth bokeh. The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. The 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.2 is another story.While the 135mm f/2, in general, is a good lens, there are lots of lenses other than the 135 f/2 that will produce a very smoothly blurred background, including zoom lenses.It sounds like Micael is new to photography.Just my impression from this article. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. She's cold? Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. Does the bright star reflection bother you? I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. Backwards compatible (film). The California Nebula. I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. $581.00 for 7 days. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. They account for much of the disagreement that we see on-line (but not for the rudeness and viciousness of some of it). Contrasty but not harsh. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. I have a Nikon d 500. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. If the telescope mount is precisely aligned to the celestial north pole, unguided exposures of one to two minutes are possible. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. Is it possible to get good results on a Baader filter modifed Canon 450D and a good telephoto lens, or do I need to get a good APO? Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM (72mm filters, 0.9m/3' close-focus, 25.0 oz./708g, about $1,035.) Add To Cart. I find neither the cat nor the duck particularly good. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. The difference between modern and old telephoto lenses is probably similar to the difference between my APO and an old Jaegers 5in F5. Not too heavy. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 was Built for Astrophotography However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). Add To Cart. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. For this reason, a combination of a good light pollution filter, and the use of flat calibration frames are recommended. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. Have not used a 70-200 since. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. Samyang 135mm F2 0 ED penoklatkowy obiektyw asferyczny tel At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. Really like the large focusing ring. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. In fact, it might be fun to try! Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. Check out some of the photos he took. Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Also, the newer and much more expensive 200mm F4 SMC Pentax with the K mount is decisively inferior, showing small but annoying red chromatic aberration. We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots.
Largest Company In Transnistria,
Shooting In Luling, Tx,
Black Mega Churches In Chicago,
Jacquemus Customer Service Usa,
Copper Cellar Nutrition Information,
Articles C